Technical SEO Agency for Audits and Fixes

A content agency works on what your pages say. A technical SEO agency works on whether search engines can find those pages, render them, understand them and decide they deserve to rank. That covers crawling and indexing, JavaScript rendering, site speed and Core Web Vitals, internal link structure, canonical and redirect logic, structured data, international targeting and migrations. The two overlap, and a strong site needs both, but they fail in different ways. Excellent content on a site where half the pages are not indexed, or where the main text only appears after JavaScript runs, cannot rank however good it is. The difference with us is that the people diagnosing technical SEO problems are engineers who can fix them in your code, templates and server configuration, rather than consultants who hand over a report and hope a developer finds time for it.

A full crawl of the site the way a search engine sees it, combined with the data only you have access to. Search Console shows what Google has actually crawled, indexed and excluded, and why. Analytics shows which pages and templates carry traffic and conversions, which is how findings get ranked. Chrome field data shows how real users experience your Core Web Vitals. Where the site is large, server logs show exactly where crawlers spend their time. From those we check indexing and coverage, rendering, canonicals and redirects, internal linking and orphaned pages, sitemaps and robots rules, structured data, mobile rendering and hreflang where relevant. The output is a written audit with each finding explained, located, ranked by impact and effort, and paired with the specific fix, plus a baseline so every change can be measured afterwards.

Yes, and this is where engineering experience matters most. JavaScript sites can rank very well, but only when the content, links and metadata that matter are present in the HTML the server sends, or are rendered reliably when Google processes the page. Many are not. Common problems include content that only loads after a client-side data fetch, navigation built from click handlers instead of real links, titles and canonicals rewritten after load, and pages that return a normal status code when they should return a 404. Most AI crawlers do not run JavaScript at all, so client-only content is invisible to them. We compare the server response with the rendered page for each template, then fix the gaps, usually by moving the pages that need to rank to server-side rendering or static generation, which Next.js, Nuxt and similar frameworks support directly.

Less than many tools suggest, but more than nothing. Core Web Vitals are part of Google's page experience signals, and Interaction to Next Paint replaced First Input Delay as the responsiveness metric in March 2024. In ranking terms they act mostly as a tiebreaker between pages of similar relevance and quality, so a fast page with weak content will not outrank a slow page with much better content. Their larger effect is commercial: slow, unstable pages lose visitors and conversions, which affects revenue whether or not rankings move. For that reason we prioritize Core Web Vitals work by the traffic and revenue each template carries, fix the specific cause of each failing metric using real user data rather than a single lab test, and report the change in both the field scores and conversion rate, so the value of the work is visible either way.

Both. Some clients need a single audit and implementation project, for example to recover from a traffic drop or prepare for a migration, and then manage things themselves. Many sites, though, keep changing: new templates ship, plugins and extensions update, developers refactor, and marketing launches new sections. Each of those can quietly break canonicals, block rendering or orphan pages, and the damage often goes unnoticed until traffic has already fallen. Ongoing technical SEO support covers checking releases before and after they go live, monitoring indexing and Core Web Vitals, alerting on regressions, reviewing new templates at the design stage, and implementing fixes as they come up. It works best when we have access to your staging environment and release notes, so problems are caught before they reach production rather than weeks after.